Sneaky Bastards

Behind Enemy Lines

Dismantle Nazi Germany piece by piece in this stealth review of Pyro Studios’ classic isometric strategy game, Commandos.

[one_third]Dismantle Nazi Germany piece by piece in this stealth review of Pyro Studios’ classic isometric strategy game, Commandos.[/one_third]


[message_box title=”Win a copy of Commandos from GOG.com!”]Interested in trying out Commandos? We’re giving away a copy of it on Sneaky Bastards! Click here to find out how you could win![/message_box]

What comes to mind when I mention stealth gaming? Is it watching a guard patrolling unaware, three glowing green dots hovering in the darkness above? Is it hacking into a security system to disable hostile turrets and cameras? Is it sneaking through darkened medieval corridors, blackjack ready to strike? Perhaps it’s all of these things, but maybe – just maybe – the foremost image in your mind’s eye is of a motley crew of elite soldiers bringing down Nazi Germany from within.

The pseudo-historic setting of the game is supported by cutscenes featuring wartime footage, which helps add an air of authenticity.

Commandos: Behind Enemy Lines hit shelves a scant couple of months before Looking Glass’ opus in 1998, and while the latter may define the genre for many, the former is no less deserving of praise within the stealth arena.

Difficulty in accepting it as a true stealth game may arise in its presentation however. Thief would have us believe that the silent approach works best in the first person. More recent titles like Deus Ex: Human Revolution combine first and third person to great effect, providing periphery beyond that of an ordinary human being, while still managing to feel contextually relevant.

How then, could an isometric perspective provide an effective platform from which one could get one’s sneak on? There are multiple approaches to the problem. There’s the RPG method, as seen in Baldur’s Gate: thieves with backstab bonuses and various vanishing tricks. There’s the turn-based approach, as seen in the likes of Jagged Alliance: a reliance on visual range, light sources, and camouflage all playing their part. And then there’s the real-time tactical gameplay of Commandos.

To this day, few developers have attempted – much less achieved – the style of game that Pyro Studios pioneered with Commandos. There was no single element, but rather a perfect storm of ideas and features to which the game could attribute its brilliance. Where Jagged Alliance 2 would hide detailed enemy movement outside your team’s line of sight, Commandos allowed the player to view the whole level – every enemy, vehicle and patrol – as though issuing a challenge: here’s what you’re up against – JUST TRY to beat it.

Storm the beach, destroy all the artillery and escape to the buoy? Piece of cake. Except for all those red dots on the map there which show enemy troops waiting to kill me.

Like Thief, every aspect of Commandos was designed around forcing the player into a silent and deliberate approach. Each level hosted overwhelming odds, with crafty level design and enemy placement that ensured a quick demise for anyone rushing in for a headlong assault. There were masses of guards, all with individual cones of vision, overlapping, criss-crossing, and constantly rotating as they scanned for infiltration. Patrols could be particularly tricky, as each member had his own vision; just because the patrol leader didn’t spot you, didn’t mean the rear-guard wouldn’t.

It was possible to find areas away from prying eyes by clicking the vision icon on the ground. This would then reveal a guard whose gaze fell upon chosen location, and while it may not sound too taxing, Pyro only allowed the player to see a single guard’s vision at any time.

Screen is split to track patrols and keep an eye on where they’re looking. The Green Beret needs to be careful here as he is leaving tracks in the snow that enemies will investigate.

To manage the plethora of information players needed to successfully navigate levels, it was also possible to split the screen into as many as six panels, and set the camera in each to follow patrols, watch areas of the level, or even observe other commandos.

This also facilitated the coordination required between each commando. The unique skills of the six soldiers necessitated careful planning, as quite often a specific ability was required at a specific location, at a specific time.


The Green Beret

The Green Beret was a master of stealth and distraction. He used a noise emitting device to draw enemy attention, and could bury himself in the ground, lying in wait like a heavily muscled trapdoor spider – his fangs a combat knife, poised to sink into an enemy’s back. His strength allowed him scale cliffs and walls, as well as move bodies and explosive barrels to strategic locations.


The Sniper

The Sniper’s rifle was one of the game’s greatest assets. A single shot killed an enemy at great range, but ammunition was limited, ensuring that only the highest priority targets were sighted down its scope. If any of the team were wounded, the Sniper could also patch them up with his first aid kit.


The Marine

With a SCUBA tank, the Marine could travel underwater, undetectable to enemy eyes. His harpoon gun allowed for silent takedowns over distance, though he also carried a knife for close encounters. Unlike the Green Beret, the Marine couldn’t carry the bodies he left in his wake, so care had to be taken that enemies would not see them. By using an inflatable boat, however, it was possible to have him ferry other commandos over bodies of water to assist with clean-up.


The Sapper

While perhaps the antithesis of stealth, there are approximately no ways to silently explode an enemy installation, so although the Sapper could cut holes in chain fences with his pliers, and deploy a modified bear trap to instantly kill solo patrolling enemies, his specialty was – as his title implies – blowing stuff up. Grenades, time-bombs, and remotely detonated explosives were all a part of his arsenal.


The Driver

In those times when making a lot of noise was unavoidable, the Driver was handy to have. His ability to commandeer enemy vehicles and gun turrets made him of paramount importance to seeing the others to safety, whether by acting as their getaway driver, providing covering fire with his submachine gun, or by blowing holes in enemy lines with a freshly stolen tank.


The Spy

The Spy was probably the most fun of all the commandos, able to hide in plain sight after stealing a General’s uniform, he was also fluent in German and so could convincingly distract lower-ranking enemies. His weapon of choice was a poison-filled syringe, though his identity was instantly revealed if anyone else spotted him administering the lethal injection, or carrying away the human evidence of his crime.


Though each of the commandos had a handgun to fall back on, it was largely an ineffective weapon when pitted against the superior range and damage of the German soldiers’ machine guns, and so understanding and utilising the full spectrum of abilities at the commandos’ disposal was key to victory.

Despite the specific roles they all had to play, the game never felt linear. There was never only one correct path to win any given level; put two different commandos in front of the same mission and there’d be two different solutions.

The bridge has been rigged with explosives, and the three German sappers watch each other carefully, with orders to detonate on any suspicious activity. I need to take them out simultaneously to succeed here.

The levels themselves were quite varied as well. Whether destroying key enemy infrastructure, or assassinating important officials, the mission parameters were constantly changing, increasing in difficulty as the game progressed. Gunfire that was tolerated in early missions would trigger alarms that resulted in game failure (or inundated the level with troops and patrols, making it exponentially more difficult) later on. Likewise, blowing up an enemy installation may be all that’s required initially for mission success, where in subsequent levels this could have caused masses of troops to converge on your position while you tried desperately to get to the extraction zone.

The difficulty at times felt as though it was dialled up to 11, but the challenge only made success that much sweeter.

The complex nature of Commandos’ stealth gameplay should now be readily apparent, and perhaps herein lies the reason this genre is largely untouched. The interplay between enemy AI and player skill, the commanding of multiple independent characters with distinctive skillsets, the multiple paths to each solution, and the reliance on split-second timing, all bear the hallmarks of clever puzzle design – a rare talent in the games industry.

I have two mission objectives on this level, the primary to rescue the pilot in the bottom right screen, and the secondary to destroy the planes before escaping!

They’re obviously very different games, but it’s nevertheless interesting to note the difference in approach when compared to a game like Thief, which fundamentally relied on the restrictions of the first-person perspective to help heighten immersion and tension. Commandos, conversely, relying on almost a sensory-overload of information to achieve the same result.

Both games’ mechanics are timeless. It’s unlikely their core systems will become dated in the way their graphics engines have, though Commandos’ 1024×768 resolution still looks surprisingly good, even when scaled to fit a 1920×1200 24” monitor. It was a genuine shock to fire up the GOG release of the game and find it relatively unscathed by the ravages of time. It says a lot that a game now 14 years old is as playable and as challenging as the day it was released. But I digress.

Commandos: Behind Enemy Lines is probably not the first game that comes to mind when you think stealth gaming, but its unconventional approach is exactly what made it stand out. It managed to be both frenetic and sedate, simultaneously action and puzzler, heavy on planning with splash of improvisation. It was a stealth game unlike any we’d seen before, and to my mind, defined the stealth genre in a way no game has matched since.

19 thoughts on “Behind Enemy Lines

  1. I\’ll have to try this one out !

    On real-time stealth, there\’s also Fallout : Tactics. It\’s not pure stealth, but you can set up ambushes with some craftiness.

    1. I\’ve got Tactics somewhere, but never had a chance to play it. The aforementioned Jagged Alliance 2 allows for stealthy play, and Desperados is probably the closest thing in terms of gameplay to the Commandos series.

    1. You might be surprised how well the game presents itself, Drewcifer. It does a good job of providing microscosms of action that you can move between at a sedate pace. The first time I completed it, I didn\’t even use the split screen or camera follow options, plus you\’re never in danger at the start of missions so you have time to watch and plan your moves.

      I honestly can\’t recommend the game highly enough, and it\’s really cheap – $5.99 on GOG.com gets you Behind Enemy Lines and the standalone expansion Beyond the Call of Duty. C\’mon, it\’s cheaper than two cups of coffee!

    2. I did suffer from a bit of sensory overload while playing. The most daunting moments are just after you\’ve finished a mission: you\’ve systematically reduced a complex and fiendish situation down to absolute control, picking at guards until your objective is laid out before you. Your well-earned reward is the completion of the objective, most probably surrounded by the (well-hidden) corpses of dozens of your enemies. And then the next mission starts and oh my God there are effing *thousands* of guards and they\’re *everywhere* and I don\’t know *how* I\’m going to beat this one.

      But, as the article says, that insane difficulty only makes your victories all the sweeter. And it\’s not like the game drops you in at the deep end: the first few missions are not exactly *simple*, since any Commando level is an intricate puzzle, but they are pretty *easy* since there aren\’t that many guards. So you have ample opportunity to play around with the commandos before they get pitted against anything really difficult. And as Terrence says, the game always allows you to plan, and if you think hard enough and are resourceful, you\’ll figure out a way to chip away at those guard patrols.

  2. Loved this game… spent many hours playing…

    The most important thing you forgot… cooperative play!
    It can have upto 4 players going through the campaigns – brilliant fun

    1. You are of course, 100% correct Maverick. I never played this originally, as I didn\’t have a network, or the Internet, or even other people to play it with, when the game was released!

      I imagine that some decent teamwork would have made the process a whole lot easier!

  3. If you like Commandos, there are other like it.
    Not as good, Like Wanted: Dead or a live, a western and
    Robin Hood: Legend of sherwood. Of those two I would reccommend Wanted.

  4. Did anyone play the sequels? I only ever played the original. Are they any good? Do they preserve this very unique style of play?

    1. For the most, yes. Commandos 2 (it\’s been a while since I\’ve played it so the following may not be 100% correct, but it\’d be close) introduced some additional complexity in that each commando has an inventory that needs to be managed, (think Men at War – items swappable between commandos), and they have more shared abilities: e.g. they can all take and use more powerful weapons from fallen enemies, instead of this just being the Driver\’s role

      Additionally, each commando can also disguise using enemy uniforms, but had a time limit – i.e. uniform disguise was a consumable, and would only fool soldiers at a distance. (though the Spy\’s disguise was still unlimited and worked in close range if I recall) I think disguises also worked to varying degrees based on how high the rank of the uniform was.

      Some other improvements, like ability to rotate screen, enter/exit buildings through windows, with building interiors also made for some fun challenges.

      I never got around to playing Strike Force, however, so I\’m keen to find and devour that one to see how the perspective departure holds up.

      I do also recommend Commandos 2 and 3, and if you enjoy those, you might also like Men at War (though from my playing it wasn\’t so much stealth-focussed).

    2. Oh and from Commandos 2 they also added sound to commando movement. If you tried to run up behind an enemy for a backstab, he\’d be alerted by the sound before you could reach him, and turn around and destroy you! 🙂
      Sound was represented by a rippling effect emanating from the source of the noise. It meant you did a lot of walking or crawling around instead of running!

    3. Man of War Vietnam had some fine stealth, bugged, but it was fun in coop to try and win each mission as silently as possible.

    4. I found Commandos 2 to be the superior, the overall polish, varied levels and introduction of new mechanics really made it the crowning piece of the series for me. As far as stealth goes, there are maybe only a handful of sequences that stealth can\’t be used to complete (some of the bonus stages spring to mind along with the assault portions of the second training and Burma missions with the Ghurka). Clearing Bridge over the river Kwai without being spotted once and not a single lethal takedown was one of the larger \”f$%& yeah!\” moments I have had in gaming

  5. I remember playing the demo of Commandos. It\’s a real challenge to be sure. Not necessarily meant to be played with zero casualties (I presume) it still requires a meticulous way of playing to complete the missions.

    Also, I recall I was pretty bad at it.

    1. Yeah, I\’m pretty sure Commandos was never designed to be played with no casualties. Pretty much the only way through each level (at least in Behind Enemy Lines) is to slowly pick your way through nigh on every enemy in the map to cut a path through to your objectives.
      It wasn\’t always necessary to take out all the enemy soldiers, but I think it was darn near a lot of the time.

  6. Frankly, I\’m stupefied by the fact that there are still people who\’ve never played Behind Enemy Lines. I remember it being the first CD I bought. Ah, memories! Question is whether any of the recently released games are as playable in fifteen years as Commandos is now. Personally, I\’ve always considered BEL to be more about puzzle solving than about stealth. But come to think of it, discretion was essential to success in the majority of the game\’s scenarios and silently sneaking around is what your subordinates did all the time, so why not?

    Also, a slight remark concerning the article by Terrence Jarrad. Sniper was but one of three commandos capable of equipping the first aid kit, the deal being that only one member of the team could wield it in a given mission. Driver had the highest priority in receiving the kit and Spy was next in line. Sniper would perform medical duties exclusively in the absence of the former two. Otherwise, I found the review to be a faithful account of the game, which is no doubt among the greatest in history.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *